Ohmic Audio

4.2 Equalization and Time Alignment

🔰 BEGINNER LEVEL: EQ Basics

What is Equalization?

Equalization (EQ) = Adjusting volume of specific frequencies.

Why use EQ: - Fix peaks and dips in response - Adjust to personal taste - Compensate for cabin acoustics - Match to music genre

Before and after EQ response graph comparing an uneven measured response to a smoother corrected response
EQ is easiest to understand when you compare measurements before and after. The goal is usually not a dramatic shape change, but a more controlled response with fewer obvious peaks and holes.

Types of EQ:

Graphic EQ: - Fixed frequency bands (sliders) - Common: 5-band, 7-band, 13-band, 31-band - Easy to use - Less precise

Parametric EQ: - Adjustable frequency - Adjustable bandwidth (Q) - Adjustable gain - More flexible - Professional choice

Using Basic EQ

Bass, Mid, Treble Controls:

Simplest EQ - three bands.

Bass: ~100 Hz - Increase: More boom, impact - Decrease: Tighter, controlled

Midrange: ~1000 Hz
- Increase: Forward vocals - Decrease: Recessed vocals

Treble: ~10,000 Hz - Increase: More sparkle, detail - Decrease: Smooth, less harsh

Guidelines: - Small adjustments (±3 dB) - Cutting better than boosting - Listen at normal volume - Use multiple tracks to test

What is Time Alignment?

Time alignment = Delaying speakers so sound arrives simultaneously at listener.

Why needed:

Your ears are different distances from each speaker: - Left tweeter: 2 feet away - Right tweeter: 4 feet away - Sound from right arrives 2ms later

Top-down vehicle diagram showing a driver seated off-center, unequal speaker path lengths, and the corrected result after adding delay so the left and right speakers arrive together at the listener.
The picture makes the goal easier to talk about: fix arrival time first, then use EQ to shape tone. If timing is wrong, the stage never stabilizes no matter how much EQ you throw at it.

Solution:

Delay left tweeter by 2ms: - Now both arrive together - Better imaging - Clearer sound - Sounds like speakers in front of you

Calculating delay:

Delay (ms) = Distance difference (inches) / 13,500

Example: - Left speaker: 24 inches away - Right speaker: 48 inches away - Difference: 24 inches

Delay = 24 / 13,500 = 1.8 ms

Delay left speaker by 1.8ms.

🔧 INSTALLER LEVEL: Professional Tuning

Parametric EQ Setup

Parameters:

1. Frequency (Center): - Which frequency to adjust - Be specific (not wide corrections)

2. Gain: - How much to boost/cut - Cutting preferred over boosting - Typical: ±3 to ±6 dB

3. Q (Quality Factor): - Bandwidth of adjustment - Low Q (0.5-1.0): Wide, gentle (2 octaves) - Medium Q (2-4): Moderate (1 octave) - High Q (8-15): Narrow, surgical (1/3 octave)

Single frequency-response chart comparing low, medium, and high Q cuts at the same center frequency, showing how lower Q affects a wider range while higher Q makes a narrow surgical move.
Think of Q as width control. The center frequency stays the same, the gain stays the same, and only the spread changes: low Q makes a broad tonal move, while high Q narrows the change down to a much smaller slice of the response.

When to use each Q:

Low Q (broad): - General tonal balance - Large room modes - Musical adjustments

Medium Q: - Most applications - Typical response corrections - Good starting point

High Q (narrow): - Removing specific resonances - Feedback suppression (live sound) - Surgical corrections

Measurement-Based EQ

Process:

Step 1: Measure frequency response - Use RTA or REW - Pink noise or sweeps - Microphone at listening position

Step 2: Identify problems - Major peaks (>6 dB) - Major dips (>6 dB) - Overall tonal balance

Step 3: Prioritize corrections - Cut peaks before boosting dips - Fix largest errors first - Don't chase perfection

Step 4: Apply EQ - One correction at a time - Re-measure after each - Verify improvement

Step 5: Listen - Measurement + listening together - Trust your ears - Test with various music

Example correction:

Measured: Peak at 80 Hz, +8 dB

EQ settings: - Frequency: 80 Hz - Gain: -8 dB - Q: 3.0 (start here, adjust if needed)

Result: Peak reduced to flat

Advanced Time Alignment

Multi-way systems:

Each driver needs individual delay:

Side-view vehicle diagram comparing different driver arrival times before alignment against a corrected after-alignment view, with tweeter, midbass, and subwoofer distances and example delay values shown.
The goal is not matching physical distance. The goal is matching arrival time. Use the farthest driver as the reference, then add delay to the closer drivers until the sound reaches the listening position together.

Measurement procedure:

Method 1: Tape measure

  1. Measure from each driver to listener's ear
  2. Note distances (in inches)
  3. Subtract distances from furthest driver
  4. Convert to time delays

Example: - Subwoofer (trunk): 72 inches - Midbass (door): 30 inches - Tweeter (dash): 24 inches

From subwoofer (reference, no delay): - Midbass: (72-30) / 13,500 = 3.1 ms delay - Tweeter: (72-24) / 13,500 = 3.6 ms delay

Method 2: Acoustic measurement (more accurate)

  1. Generate impulse or sweep
  2. Measure impulse response
  3. Software calculates delay automatically
  4. Apply calculated delays

Software: REW, ARTA, TrueRTA

Fine-tuning by ear:

After measurement-based alignment:

  1. Play music with strong center image (vocals)
  2. Adjust delays in small steps (0.1-0.5 ms)
  3. Listen for:

    • Centered vocals
    • Clear imaging
    • No phasiness
  4. Optimal setting = most focused image

Target Curves

"Flat" isn't always best!

In-room response should NOT be flat:

Comparison chart showing flat, B and K house, and Harman-style target curves with notes about tonal tradeoffs and why most in-car tuning targets are not perfectly flat from bass through treble.
Target curves are listening tools, not ideological camps. The right curve is the one that gives you believable tonal balance in the cabin after the measurements are honest and the timing is already under control.

Why not flat?

  1. Fletcher-Munson effect:

    • Ears less sensitive to bass/treble
    • Perception requires boost
  2. Room/cabin acoustics:

    • Natural rolloff at high frequencies
    • Boundary gain at low frequencies
  3. Personal preference:

    • Some prefer more warmth (bass)
    • Some prefer more sparkle (treble)

Common target curves:

B&K House Curve: - +6 dB at 20 Hz - Slopes to 0 dB at 500 Hz - Flat to 20 kHz

Harman Curve: - +6 dB at 20 Hz - Slopes to 0 dB at 250 Hz - -4 dB at 20 kHz

Your custom curve: - Adjust to taste - Start with standard curve - Modify based on preference - Re-test periodically

⚙️ ENGINEER LEVEL: Advanced DSP Theory

Minimum Phase vs Linear Phase

Minimum phase system:

Magnitude and phase responses related by Hilbert transform.

Properties: - Minimum group delay for given magnitude response - Causal (doesn't predict future) - Most analog filters are minimum phase

Phase response:

φ(ω) = -imag[H(ln|H(jω)|)]

Where H = Hilbert transform

Linear phase system:

Properties: - Constant group delay: τ_g = constant - No phase distortion - Preserves waveshape - FIR filters can achieve linear phase

Phase response:

φ(ω) = -ω × τ_g

Comparison:

Minimum phase EQ: - Lower latency - Phase shifts with magnitude - Can cause pre-ringing (minor) - IIR implementation (efficient)

Linear phase EQ: - Higher latency - No phase distortion - Can cause pre-ringing (more severe) - FIR implementation (CPU intensive)

For car audio:

Minimum phase generally preferred: - Lower latency - More efficient - Phase effects inaudible for typical EQ

Linear phase for: - Mastering/production - Critical listening - If CPU allows

Psychoacoustic Optimization

Critical bands:

Human hearing analyzes sound in ~24 critical bands (Bark scale).

Bandwidth increases with frequency:

Center Freq Bandwidth Equivalent Q
50 Hz 50 Hz 1.0
500 Hz 100 Hz 5.0
5000 Hz 1100 Hz 4.5
15000 Hz 3500 Hz 4.3

Implication for EQ:

Optimal Q matches critical bandwidth:

At 100 Hz: Q = 1-2 At 1000 Hz: Q = 3-5 At 10 kHz: Q = 3-5

Audibility of EQ:

Just Noticeable Difference (JND): - Midrange: ~1 dB - Bass/Treble: ~2-3 dB

Below JND: Won't hear difference (don't bother) At JND: Subtle but audible 2× JND: Clearly audible

Masking effects:

Loud sound masks nearby frequencies: - ±1/3 octave for narrowband masker - ±1 octave for broadband masker

Implication: EQ changes in masked regions may be inaudible!

Time/Frequency Uncertainty

Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies to audio:

Δt × Δf ≥ 1 / (4π)

Cannot have perfect time AND frequency resolution simultaneously.

Short time window: - Good time resolution - Poor frequency resolution - Good for transients

Long time window: - Poor time resolution - Good frequency resolution - Good for steady-state

For crossovers:

Sharp frequency cutoff (high Q) creates time smearing.

Example: 80 Hz crossover, Q = 15

Frequency resolution: ±5 Hz (very precise) Time resolution: 1/5 = 0.2 seconds (very smeared!)

Trade-off:

Steep crossover: - Excellent frequency separation - Time smearing (minimal impact below ~200 Hz)

Gentle crossover: - More frequency overlap - Better time domain

Practical implication:

Below ~150 Hz: Steep crossovers okay (wavelength long, time resolution less critical)

Above 2 kHz: Consider gentler slopes (time resolution matters more)

FIR Filter Design Methods

Window method:

Process: 1. Define ideal frequency response H_ideal(ω) 2. Inverse FFT to get impulse response h[n] 3. h[n] is infinite - must truncate 4. Apply window function to taper ends

Window functions:

Rectangular: - No tapering - Sharpest frequency response - Worst sidelobes (-13 dB)

Hanning: - Cosine taper - Good compromise - Sidelobes: -31 dB

Blackman: - More gradual taper - Excellent sidelobes (-58 dB) - Wider main lobe

Kaiser: - Adjustable parameter β - Trade-off between main lobe and sidelobes - Optimal for many applications

Frequency sampling method:

Process: 1. Sample desired H(ω) at N points 2. Inverse DFT gives h[n] directly 3. N taps, length N filter

Advantage: Direct control of frequency response

Disadvantage: Frequency resolution = f_s / N

Optimal (Parks-McClellan) method:

Equiripple design: - Minimizes maximum error - Optimal in minimax sense - Remez exchange algorithm

Results: - Shortest filter for given specs - Equal ripple in passband and stopband - Industry standard

Software: MATLAB firpm(), scipy.signal.remez()